The Worst Default Layouts in Popular File Managers

File management is an essential part of our digital lives. Whether you're a student, professional, or just someone who likes to keep their files ...

organized, choosing the right file manager can make all the difference. However, many popular file managers come with default layouts that might not suit everyone’s needs. In this blog post, we will explore some of the worst default layouts in popular file managers and discuss alternative options for a more user-friendly interface.

1. Windows Explorer Layout
2. Misuse of Space
3. MacOS Finder Layout
4. Nautilus (GNOME Files) Layout
5. Conclusion

1.) Windows Explorer Layout

2.) Misuse of Space

Windows Explorer, the default file manager on Windows OS, often misuses screen space by displaying unnecessary icons and clutter. This can make it difficult to find essential files or navigate through folders efficiently.

Lack of Customization

The lack of customization options forces users to adapt to a layout that might not be optimal for their workflow. Users are limited to the default settings provided, which may not cater to specific needs like displaying thumbnails, icons, or detailed information about each file and folder.

Performance Issues

With too much information displayed at once, Windows Explorer can slow down your computer’s performance due to excessive use of system resources. This is particularly noticeable when dealing with large libraries of files and folders.

Alternative: File Manager for Windows (FMFW)

FMFW offers a more customizable interface that allows users to choose between different views such as icons, list, or tile view. It also supports plugins for additional functionality like file search, compression, and cloud integration. Customizing the layout according to individual needs can significantly improve both usability and performance.

3.) MacOS Finder Layout

Cluttered Interface

MacOS Finder tends to be cluttered with too many icons and features that might not always serve a purpose. This can overwhelm new users or those who prefer a cleaner interface.

Limited Customization

While MacOS offers some customization options, they are quite limited compared to more advanced file managers. Users cannot easily rearrange the layout or add third-party plugins for additional functionality.

Inconsistency Across Versions

There have been instances where changes in Finder layout and features were not consistent across different versions of macOS, leading to confusion among users.

Alternative: Dolphin File Manager (for MacOS)

Dolphin File Manager is an excellent alternative that offers advanced file management capabilities along with a highly customizable interface. Users can easily switch between list view, icons view, and detailed view based on their preference. It also supports drag-and-drop operations and extensive search options to enhance productivity.

4.) Nautilus (GNOME Files) Layout

Disorganized Information Display

Nautilus, the default file manager in GNOME desktop environment, often displays information in a disorganized manner which can be frustrating for users who are looking for quick access to specific files or folders.

Lack of Thumbnails and Detailed Views

The lack of thumbnail views and detailed information about each file and folder can make it difficult to distinguish between different types of files at a glance. This is particularly problematic when dealing with large collections of media files.

Performance Bottlenecks

With too much information displayed without any optimization for performance, Nautilus can slow down your system’s responsiveness, especially on older or less powerful computers.

Alternative: Astro File Manager (for Linux)

Astro File Manager is a modern and fast file manager designed specifically for Linux distributions. It offers features like customizable views with thumbnails, tags, and detailed information panels to improve usability without sacrificing performance. The integrated search functionality also helps in quickly finding files across different locations within the filesystem.

5.) Conclusion

Choosing the right file manager can significantly enhance your productivity and ease of use when managing digital files. While popular operating systems come with default file managers that might not always meet all user requirements, alternatives like FMFW for Windows, Dolphin File Manager for MacOS, or Astro File Manager for Linux provide more flexibility in terms of customization and features. By exploring these alternative layouts, you can create a more efficient and enjoyable digital workspace tailored to your specific needs.

The Worst Default Layouts in Popular File Managers